IMAP Department of Philosophy

(Credit 2)
必修
Intended Year:
Intended School:
Research and Professional Development
Research and Professional Development
Sub Title　 Career Advice beyond the PhD
Professor Ellen VAN GOETHEM
 Numbering Code:
Course Code:
2026 SpringTerm
biweekly Fri3
Ito 研究室 Classroom
E科目 (English, English)
: 2026/1/29 (08:58)
Course Overview This course enables the incremental and coherent development of research effectiveness, professional and scholarly integrity, publication and grant proposal preparation, and employment strategies. This course is held every semester with credits awarded in the final semester.
Each semester, there will be a focus on one of the following skills. Other suggestions can be made.
State of the field
Conference presentations
Grant proposals and applications
Creating a CV
Publishing
Job market
Interviewing
Book review
Lecture/symposium
Teaching (lesson development, syllabi, etc.)
Organizing a conference panel or symposium
Speaker invitations
Careers outside academia
Keywords :
Prerequisites :
Required Ability :
Notes
Remote/On-site Information regarding Moodle
● 対面授業
リアルタイム-オンライン授業
ハイブリッド授業（対面＋オンライン）
オンデマンド型授業
課題提出型授業

教職 :
資格 :
Course Objectives
かなり優れている 優れている 及第である 一層の努力が必要
D_B-2 [博士：独創性]
新たな視点から問題提起を行い、それを解決するための方法を体系的に提示できる。		 EXCELLENT LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "outstanding."		 GOOD LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "good."		 SATISFACTORY LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "satisfactory."		 DEFICIENT:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "deficient."
D_C [博士：他者を尊重する公平な姿勢]
先行研究と自らの学説を批判的に討論し、自らの意見をより客観的視点から組み立て、他者の意見を尊重する、市民性のある公平な姿勢で論文を作成し、その分野の学術研究を先導する貢献をすることができる。		 EXCELLENT LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "outstanding."		 GOOD LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "good."		 SATISFACTORY LEVEL:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "satisfactory."		 DEFICIENT:
Student achievement
in this area, as
measured through
his/her level of class
preparation and
participation,
completion of
assignments, and
performance on the
quizzes is evaluated
as "deficient."
九州大学文学部ディプロマ・ポリシー
九州大学文学部哲学コース・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)　　　九州大学文学部歴史学コース・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)
九州大学文学部文学コース・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)　　　九州大学文学部人間科学コース・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)
九州大学人文科学府人文基礎専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府人文基礎専攻・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)
九州大学人文科学府歴史空間論専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府歴史空間論専攻・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)
九州大学人文科学府言語・文学専攻ディプロマ・ポリシー　　　九州大学人文科学府言語・文学専攻・カリキュラムマップ(2025年度版)
Course Plan
授業形態（項目） 授業形態（内容）
● 講義
● 外国語演習
原典資料演習
● 実習／フィールド調査
● Problem-Based Learning （問題発見・解決型学習）
● 学生のプレゼンテーション
Moodle の使用
学外実習
野外実習

Textbooks : No textbook is used.
Reference Books :
Course Handouts :

Course Plan ()
Tentative Weekly Schedules Lecture Exercise, Field trip etc. Comments, suggestions for the course preparation, review, etc.
1 Introduction
2 Group meeting and discussion
3 Group meeting and discussion
4 Group meeting and discussion
5 Group meeting and discussion
6 Group meeting and discussion
7 Group meeting and discussion
8 Group meeting and discussion
9 Group meeting and discussion
10 Group meeting and discussion
11 Group meeting and discussion
12 Group meeting and discussion
13 Group meeting and discussion
14 Group meeting and discussion
15 Group meeting and discussion

Evaluation
Standpoint→
Evaluation Method
↓		 D_B-2
[博士：独創性]		 D_C
[博士：他者を尊重する公平な姿勢]		 Grading Percentage, Disqualification etc.
Attendance ◎ ◎ 50
In-class contribution ◎ ◎ 50

GPA Evaluation
A B C D F
授業を通じて、総じて「かなり優れている」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、概ね「優れている」を超える活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「及第する」に相当する活動を行った。 授業を通じて、総じて「及第する」には達しないものの、それに近い活動を行った。 授業を通じて、「一層の努力が必要」の活動にとどまった。

Additional Information regarding Evaluation Method :
Study Consultation (Office Hours) Study Consultation (Office Hours) :

Suggestion for success (Specific) :

: